How we research
We use official pricing pages and product documentation, then explain the practical implications with our own worked examples. Where we discuss external reviews or user reports, we link to the original source and distinguish their observations from our own work. Each comparison identifies its sources and check date. We distinguish published specifications from our interpretation.
What we have not tested
Our current comparisons are desk research. We have not measured inbox placement, benchmarked speed or tested support quality. We do not publish star ratings, customer testimonials or claims of personal product use without evidence.
How the site is funded
We intend to earn affiliate commissions when readers follow labelled links and make qualifying purchases. Applications are pending. At present all provider links are ordinary links and generate no affiliate commission for us. Approval will not by itself turn every link into an affiliate link.
Editorial independence
We explain limitations whether or not a provider offers a commission. We do not sell positive conclusions or claim to cover the entire market. Any future paid placement or affiliate link will be identified where readers encounter it.
Corrections and maintenance
Send corrections to info@wepicktools.com with the page URL and a supporting source. We check reported errors and update the relevant article when warranted. The published check date describes our source review, not a promise that a provider has made no subsequent changes.
Images
The two illustrations on our homepage were created with AI for WePickTools. They are editorial illustrations, not product screenshots or evidence of testing.